Swift hook launcher (BIN-283)
Darwin dispatch for plugin hooks with a node fallback — no more anonymous interpreter processes per hook.
Cross-agent memory
Persistent context for every coding agent — Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini, OpenClaw, Copilot — from one hook core. Swift Darwin dispatch moat, plugin discovery with SemVer, project-identity resolution. 533/533 tests, proven non-virgin recall (1,540 observations). The repo is the pack.
Every coding agent ships its own memory, so the learning dies with the tool that wrote it. This fork of claude-mem inverts that: one SQLite store, and any writer — Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Antigravity, Hermes, pi, or a plain shell script — deposits its checkpoint note through the same idempotent bridge, the claude-mem-for-all CLI (tools/claude-mem-for-all.swift).
The store’s provenance is the point. Every deposit is tagged platform_source (pi, hermes, …) — a learning stays attributed to the agent that produced it instead of collapsing into claude just because it landed in the same database.
Darwin dispatch for plugin hooks with a node fallback — no more anonymous interpreter processes per hook.
Worker bootstrap and memory injection are separate hooks, each observable on its own.
One static binary instead of an interpreter herd. The repo’s own docs/why-swift.md names the cases where Python, bash, or curl would be the right call.
Synced with upstream main through the v13.24.1 line; upstream features merged intact.
Proof, not vibes. 533/533 tests green, and 1,540 observations with proven non-virgin recall — memory written by one agent, actually read back by a different one. A store nobody re-reads is a write-only log, and a write-only log is not memory.
Honesty: the numbers are the fork’s own, from its README and test suite — not independently re-run for this page. The repo is the pack: architecture, data-flow, and integration-matrix diagrams plus per-agent recipes live in the repo, not in this summary.